The traditional Roman martyrology gives the date of creation as 5,199BC. This is not a date that anyone would come up with by using the Vulgate bible. Hence St Bede, basing himself on the Vulgate, calculated the date as 3,592BC. The date on the martyrology apparently derives from some version of the Septuagint, from which the Latin version of the bible anterior to the Vulgate derives. Eusebius of Caesarea placed this date into his Chronicon, which was translated into Latin by St Jerome around AD 378. See here for a reasonably learned study, which is however strangely lacking a footnote for the reference to Bede.
Ven. Mary of Agreda says that she was told by the Blessed Virgin that 5,199 was the date of creation. Her superior or spiritual director, I forget which, told her to ask again, and Mary of Agreda says that she was again told plainly that this was the correct date.
There was a wide-spread belief in the early patristic period that the world as we know it would last 6,000 years, and that this would be followed by a thousand year reign of Christ and the saints. This is inspired, among other things, by Apoc. 20:22 – “And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.” I’ve given some examples here.
One cannot help being impressed by the fact that, starting from the date on the martyrology, six thousand years would bring us to AD 801, and that Charlemagne was crowned by the pope as the first holy Roman emperor on Christmas day 800. Was not this a reign of Christ on earth? Likewise, it is impressive that the holy empire was brought to an end a thousand years later by Napoleon who became first consul in 1799 and extinguished it over the next few years.
For the end of the world was long ago,
And all we dwell to-day
As children of some second birth,
Like a strange people left on earth
After a judgment day.
June 3, 2020 at 2:13 am
But wasn’t the tradition that the antichrist would appear after 6,000 years not that the millennium would begin?
June 3, 2020 at 3:56 pm
Both ideas seem to be found. For the millennium, see e.g. the letter of St Jerome among the quotations here:
https://exlaodicea.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/when-will-the-lord-return
St Irenaeus combines the two.
August 9, 2020 at 12:13 pm
[…] Roman martyrology gives 5199BC as the date of creation. As I have mentioned before, Venerable Mary of Agreda says that the Blessed Virgin Mary told her that this date is correct. […]
September 9, 2022 at 7:04 am
However, since that date of 5199BC is in relation to the Septuagint Text and the birth of Jesus Christ, There is another date according to the Masoretic Text and the Birth of Jesus. According to a revelation given to Ven. Anne Catherine Emmerich, Jesus was born in the Year of the World 3996. This means that the date of creation according to this revelation, is 3996BC. Since those two dates are considered to be true revelations, it means to me that the one of 5199BC was revealed to be true because it was somehow tied by the Church in Heaven, By Jerome or the Roman Martirology; but the one which is truth in reality was 3996BC.; e.g., Jesus Christ was not born on the 25 of December, but that is the date tied in Heaven by the Church. According to Ven Ann Catherine, Jesus was born on November 25, exactly one month before, and that must be true in the sense of reality, but it is not celebrated because it has not been recognized by the Church yet. And it seems, it is not important for her so far.
September 9, 2022 at 9:15 am
Actually, the Roman date is not based on the Septuagint; the latter apparently would yield something like 5500BC.